Communication Styles 2.0™ Is a Fast and Easy Way To Understand Yourself and Those Around You
To solve this problem and help everyone become more effective communicators, Communication Styles 2.0™ for Teams provides easy-to-use strategies and frameworks that anyone -regardless of background or current skill level - can use to quickly become more effective.
Good news. There are only...
Over the past decade we've worked with tens of thousands of people to develop an easy way to understand communication tendencies, strengths, and challenges - and the result is Communication Styles 2.0™.
Communication Styles 2.0 gives you and easy way to understand your natural communication tendencies and see how you are likely to interact with others with either similar or completely different natural tendencies.
And, it also gives you and easy way to understand the interactions and relationships on any team and give everyone easy-to-use strategies to quickly become more effective communicators.
Best of all, these concepts are easy to understand, easy to use, and will benefit you for the rest of your life.
Here's a quick summary:
The first axis of communication is the horizontal axis and it symbolically represents a tendency to focus on the task compared to a tendency to focus on people and relationships when communicating.
It can be represented as a line like this:
Everyone falls somewhere on this line.
Those of us who fall on the far left of the line have a very strong tendency to be task oriented, focusing on “getting to the point” and getting things done when we are talking with someone.
Some people fall toward right end of the line and tend to focus on building and maintaining relationships when they are communicating and interacting with other people.
Most people are somewhere between the ends and not on the ends. This is why there are more than just for or five communication styles.
When I explain this as part of a workshop, I usually get questions related to whether a task or a people orientation is better or which one is right or wrong. Here’s the answer as clearly as I can say it:
Neither of these is right or wrong, neither is better or worse than the other. They just are what they are.
The second axis of communication is the vertical axis and it symbolically represents a tendency to focus on the big picture compared to a tendency to focus on details when communicating.
Once again, everyone falls somewhere along the line between the two extremes.
I fall on the upper end of the line right near the top at the big picture arrow.
This means that my natural tendency when communicating is to focus on the big picture at the expense of the details.
While this can be very useful in some situations, in others it can create real problems.
Where do you think you fall on this axis?
As you can imagine, someone who has a natural tendency to focus on the big picture and has not much interest in details could easily irritate a detail oriented communicator.
Of course, the opposite is also true.
The detail person could really annoy the big picture person with their questions and insistence on knowing the exact who, what, when, where, and why of a situation, assignment, or story.
A big picture person will say “let’s go on vacation.” And the detail person will respond with “where will we stay?” or “how long?” or “how will we pay for it?” or maybe even “what if it rains?” Unfortunately, the big picture person has thought about none of these things and is simply thinking about the big idea of “going on vacation.”
You can see the potential for conflict and miscommunication if each person only uses his or her natural tendencies.
Once again, neither is better than the other or right or wrong. They simply are what they are. But they can surely irritate each other if they’re not aware of each other’s tendencies and careful in their communication
The two dimensions of the Communication Styles 2.0 model give you a clear way to predict how easy or difficult it will be to communicate with someone using your natural style.
The closer you are to someone on one of the axis, the easier it will be to communicate with them using your natural style.
The farther away you are, the more natural conflict and misunderstandings are likely to occur, but it’s not inevitable. This is especially true now that you understand your own tendencies.
It’s important to realize that there is value in having people with different communication styles interacting and working with each other.
The big picture person can benefit from the tendencies of the detail person and vice versa. The world would be a boring place if everyone were the same.
Let's make it easy to understand with...
The Communication Styles 2.0 model Circle of Styles overlays the twelve primary Communication Styles on top of the two axis of communication.
Because the Circle of Styles overlays the two axis, it is easy to determine the basic characteristics of each of the Styles based upon their location on the Circle.
The six Styles on the left side of the Circle tend to be task oriented in their communication and the six Styles on the right side tend to be people oriented when they communicate.
Likewise, the six on the top tend to be big picture and the six on the bottom are oriented more toward details when they talk to or email you.
The Communication Styles with the strongest tendencies are those on the diagonals of the Circle.
As you move around the Circle from the diagonals, the tendencies begin
to combine and soften. For example, as you move to the right and around
the top of the Circle from the Doer to the Motivator, the tendency
becomes less about task and more about people.
The Persuader is even less task and more people than the Motivator until you arrive at the Promoter who is strongly people oriented in their communication tendencies.
Now you can deduce the basic tendencies of any Style on the Circle.
This gives you a fast way of understanding how you will interact with any other style!
I know that for some readers (the big picture styles) that’s a good enough answer, but for many of you (the detail styles), it’s not. So let me give you more insight into the details.
Let's meet the blends...
In many situations, the twelve primary communication styles provide enough detail to get a fast improvement in communication between individuals and within groups.
As we worked with tens of thousands of people over the past decade, it become clear that not everyone falls neatly into one of the twelve primary Communication Styles, the Communication Styles 2.0 model has nine additional Styles to give it extra precision when describing a person’s natural Communication Style.
These blended styles each have a primary underlying Communication Style but expand to include characteristics of some of the adjacent Styles.
These blends make subtle distinctions between Communication Styles possible. This level of detail is valuable when comparing individuals to each other, diagnosing problems, or working with teams.
Because these Styles are combinations of their underlying Styles, I’m not going to go into great detail about each of them. You can come to your own conclusions by understanding the Styles that underlie each blend and drawing the necessary inferences.
To explain exactly how this works, I’ll use the following illustration of the blended Chancellor Style.
In this illustration of the Communication Styles 2.0 Circle of Styles, you can see that the Chancellor Style covers the area from Analyzer to Promoter. The center of the arc falls on the Doer.
Because the Doer is at the midpoint of the arc, it is the primary style behind the Chancellor and the Chancellor will mainly have the characteristics and motivations of the Doer.
However, since the Chancellor also wraps around the Circle in the direction of the Promoter who is people motivated and the Analyzer who is order motivated, you can know that the natural action motivation of the Doer is modified by the additional motivations of order and people.
As the arc moves farther away from its center point the influence of the underlying Styles decreases. In this Chancellor example, this means that the impact of the Doer is greatest, the Challenger and Motivator are secondary, the Solver and Persuader have the next amount of impact, and the Analyzer and Promoter have the least amount of impact.
Everything Put Together
Because effective communication is the foundational skill that underlies all other skills, our mission is to create frameworks and strategies that anyone can use to quickly become a more effective communicator regardless of their background or current skill level.
How can this benefit you and your team?
Copyright(C) 2015-2021 Maximum Advantage / DataTech Software Inc.
Communication Styles 2.0™, the Circle of Styles ™ and the style names are trademarks of Maximum Advantage